
Despite health risks and environmental damage, the meat industry is working hard to safeguard its dominance
Should I tuck into a juicy steak or stick a tofu patty in a bun and call it a burger? Twenty years ago, that question was largely seen as a moral dilemma influenced by grim conditions in factory farms and slaughterhouses. Back then, animal rights activists were the loudest campaigners arguing for people to abstain from meat. They had limited success because vegetarians and vegans made up less than 5% of the population in rich countries โ and the best fake meats were bland replicas of real flesh. The word flexitarian had not yet made it into the dictionary.
The debate has shifted sharply. The pollution from animal agriculture, which makes up 12-20% of planet-heating gas, is now part of public discourse around eating meat. A dramatic rise in rates of obesity and diseases linked to red meat have made health concerns part of individual decisions to eat less of it. Meanwhile, some plant-based alternatives have improved in texture and taste to the point where even meat lovers struggle to tell that they did not come from an animal.
Continue reading...United Kingdom
EUROPE
Related News

Chip stocks bounce back as OpenAI files for Wall Street float โ business live
15h ago
Somali referee denied US entry, dropped from FIFA World Cup 2026
19h ago

Ebola cases reach more than 500
1d ago

Zelensky says he had 'positive' talks with Trump envoys on Ukraine war
1d ago
Depression in romantic relationships: You, me and the illness
1d ago